Lagniappe: an unserious blog
in the Chicago Tribune
Not entirely thrilled with the slant, but I'm extensively quoted in the Chicago Tribune, and I even had another sentence in the quote in an earlier edition.

Also: lots of GTA coverage on blogs and in the news. The game of telephone is fascinating; the Times made a minor error in summarizing events, and the blog coverage repeating the Times summary confused all sorts of issues. It's not just the amateur gaming bloggers getting things wrong: a short piece on the Wired website had at least five errors in as many paragraphs.
wherein I can now blame Kirsten Dunst for a traffic jam
Leaving New York Wednesday, it took me 40 minutes to get from Lexington to 9th Avenue going down 37th Street, which is supposed to be an express cross-town street. It was because movie trucks were blocking most of the street; they were filming on 38th Street.

But thumbs up on Chinese Mirch (28th & Lex), which is a wonderful, if New-York-priced Chinese-Indian fusion restaurant.

Press coverage has been interesting: the New York Times got a tiny detail wrong, and it's fascinating to see all of the other press coverage that is clearly getting its information from rewriting the Times story (and repeating the mistake, and often exacerbating it as in a game of telephone) rather than original reporting. Wired, in particular, botched the story, as has the Guardian.
Interviewed on KTUU, Anchorage
I can't see the video (it was a phone interview anyway) , but here's a transcript. I discuss Exxon Shipping v. Baker, expected to come down today.
fast forward to 0:56


Yes, the five seconds they quoted me didn't leave them time to flash my name on the screen. They left my name off. As well as any supporting detail to show that this wasn't just ipse dixit. But they did have music and flashy graphics. This is why I don't watch tv news.

Double-windsor knot courtesy of Slim.

Related Posts (on one page):

  1. fast forward to 0:56
  2. In the Examiner
Posted by Ted Frank on Sunday, June 8, 2008 at 9:03am. 0 Comments
output
Posted by Ted Frank on Friday, June 6, 2008 at 2:42pm. 0 Comments
Birmingham News, June 3
Corrections and Clarifications: "The name of Ted Frank of the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research was spelled incorrectly on page 1A Saturday in an article about a credit card lawsuit. Frank also was incorrectly quoted as saying updated legislation concerning credit card disclosure information is a step in the right direction because Congress did not cap the damages for a class-action suit. The story should have said Frank believes the updated legislation has problems because Congress did not cap damages, but that it was a step in the right direction."

Wow, I didn't realize I wasn't just in Saturday's paper, I was on the front page of Saturday's paper. Albeit with my name spelled wrong.
15-minute department
the exception to "all publicity is good publicity"
This "Ted Franklin" fellow at the American Enterprise Institute who spoke to the Birmingham News about the recent Judge Acker decision and FACTA amendments sounds like an interesting fellow who has thought about some of the same issues I have, even if he holds opinions diametrically opposed to mine about the need to cap damages in FACTA class actions.

Bloomberg, at least, quoted me accurately:
Acker also ruled that the law's requirement that juries
award ``not less than $100 and not more than $1,000'' for each
willful violation gives jurors no rational basis for setting
damages. That argument is weaker than the one against
disproportionate penalties, said Ted Frank, director of the
American Enterprise Institute's Legal Center for the Public
Interest in Washington.

``To date, nobody's ever said that that makes a statute void
for vagueness,'' Frank said. ...

``Congress didn't correct the underlying problem in the
statute, which is that there's no cap on the damages for a class-
action suit,'' Frank said. ``If those circuits disagree, the
Supreme Court will have to step in and shake this out.''
That story is behind a subscription wall. When I looked for it, I did find my October 2007 television appearance on their network, which apparently has been publicly available for a while.

Related Posts (on one page):

  1. Birmingham News, June 3
  2. the exception to "all publicity is good publicity"
In the Examiner
Talking about Barack Obama.

Related Posts (on one page):

  1. fast forward to 0:56
  2. In the Examiner
15-minute roundup
I have an op-ed in today's New York Sun about the civil trial over the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

I'm quoted in City Journal on FDA litigation, and in the AARP Bulletin on Senate legislation to expand litigation over wage claims, though the latter's cribbed from my NPR blog post on the subject.
recent publications
Talking about:
Wherein I am quoted in a press release
Rep. Darrell Issa is getting grief for some clumsy remarks he made at the 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund hearing (1:42:00 or so in the video), and issued a clarifying statement.

Related Posts (on one page):

  1. Wherein I am quoted in a press release
  2. "some of the most cynical testimony i've seen"
  3. testifying tomorrow